by Nathaniel Bluedorn, Copyright April 01, 2002, all rights reserved. 19342 views
This material is taken from the book The Fallacy Detective.
1. Red Herring: Where someone introduces an irrelevant point into an argument. He may think (or he may want us to think) it proves his side, but it really doesnt.
2. Ad Hominem: Where someone attacks an opponents character, or his motives for believing something, instead of disproving his opponents argument.
3. Genetic Fallacy: Where someone condemns an argument because of where it began, how it began, or who began it.
4. Tu Quoque (You Too): Where someone dismisses your viewpoint on an issue because you are yourself inconsistent in that very thing.
5. Faulty Appeal to Authority: Where someone appeals to the authority of someone who has no special knowledge in the area they are discussing.
6. Appeal to the People: Where someone claims his viewpoint is correct just because many other people agree with it.
1. Circular Reasoning: Where someone attempts to prove his conclusion by simply restating it. He says P is true because Q is true, and Q is true because P is true.
2. Equivocation: Where the meaning of a word is changed in the middle of an argument.
3. Loaded Question: Where someone asks one question which assumes the answer to a second question.
4. Part-to-Whole: Where someone asserts that what is true of part of something must also be true of the whole thing together.
5. Whole-to-Part: Where someone asserts that what is true of something as a whole must also be true of each of its parts. This is the reverse of the part-to-whole fallacy.
6. Either-Or: Where someone asserts that we must chose between two things, when in fact we have more alternatives.
1. Hasty Generalization: Where someone generalizes about a class or group based upon a small and poor sample.
2. Weak Analogy: Where someone claims that some items which have only a few minor similarities are practically the same in almost everything else.
3. Post-hoc-ergo-propter-hoc: Where someone assumes that since A happened before B, A must have caused B.
4. Proof-by-lack-of-evidence: Where someone claims something is true simply because nobody has yet given them any evidence to the contrary.
1. Appeal to Fear: Where someone moves you to fear the consequences of not doing what he wants.
2. Appeal to Pity: Where someone urges us to do something only because we pity him, or we pity something associated with him.
3. Bandwagon: Where someone pressures us to do something just because many other people like us are doing it.
4. Exigency: Where someone offers nothing more than a time limit as a reason for us to do what he wants.
5. Repetition: Where a message is repeated loudly and very often in the hope that it will eventually be believed.
6. Transfer: Where an advertiser gets us to associate our good or bad feelings about one thing, to another unrelated thing.
7. Snob Appeal: Where someone encourages us to think his product would make us better, or stand out, from everybody else.
8. Appeal to Tradition: Where we are encouraged to buy a product or do something because it is associated with something old.
9. Appeal to Hi-tech: Where someone urges us to buy something because it is the latest thing but not necessarily because it is the best thing.
1 • Kathy A. Johnson • April 30, 2008 • 2:56 PM
This is great! I am trying to start a debate club at a “gifted” public elementary school! My husband who has his Ph.D. in Theology, gave me three things to teach:
1. Attack ad hominem
2. Red herring
3. Strawman
You have given me much more! P. S. Any debate coaches out there? Please send me your tips! Thank you Christianlogic!
2 • Kyle • July 07, 2008 • 11:55 PM
Thank you, nice n’ short, but great explanations and examples
3 • DRAKULIAN • September 08, 2008 • 7:06 PM
“THE EXCEPTION THAT DISPROVES THE RULE” This argument is a type of fallacious generalization and fallacy of composition (Whole-to-Part) in which a person attempts to debunk a known, accepted and/or official rule or law solely by simply citing there may be one or more exceptions to that rule, all the while failing to acknowledge the obvious fact that an exception is an exactly that, an exception only.
EXAMPLE 1: Fact - marijuana use is prohibit by law, but… “If smoking marijuana is legal for cancer patients, then it should be legal for everyone.”
EXAMPLE 2: Fact - murder is a capital offense, but… “if it is acceptable to kill in self-defense, it should be acceptable to kill people because they wronged me in some way.”
4 • mk starr • April 08, 2009 • 10:57 AM
Fabulous
5 • Christine Giles • April 30, 2009 • 10:04 PM
Looks like a good primer for critical thinking….good examples…non threatening…
6 • melrose • October 05, 2009 • 10:26 PM
thanks to this website. making my project is as easy as clicking…. ??thanks
7 • Samwise • December 26, 2009 • 11:58 AM
I actually had this exchange with a brother(?)...“The Holy Spirit has told me that you have an unhealthy interest in theology.”
I replied, “That’s funny, the Holy Spirit has told me that I have a healthy interest in theology.”
So I asked him, “If the Holy Spirit told you to disobey a clear Scripture verse would you do that?”
He replied that, “He would believe the Holy Spirit over the clear Scripture verse!”
Some weird appeal to authority???
8 • mayryn • March 08, 2010 • 12:30 AM
why is it that your fallacies are in complete? can you please give some examples of the following fallacies:
a.fallacy of misproportion
b.fallacy of extemism or one-sidedness
c. fallacy of figurative definition
d.fallacy of unwarranted statistic
e. fallacy of self-contradiction
f.fallay of accidentalo correlation
g. fallacy of unknowable statistics
9 • BeirutEamon • March 10, 2010 • 1:29 PM
Nice list, Nathaniel. Thanks for all your effort. Mayryn, the link you clicked on said “short list of fallacies”, not “exhaustive list of fallacies”.
What fallacy is that? Fallacy of expectation?