Argumentum Ad Baculum is an informal fallacy where one appeals to the threat of force as a reason to accept a conclusion. Wikipedia says that the Latin means, “argument to the cudgel or appeal to the stick.” One of my favorite examples of this has to do with the Roman Catholic Church and the Copernicum Revolution. Copernicus proposed the idea that the Sun was the center of the universe (heliocentrism). This was a huge paradimatic break from the view that the Earth was the center of the universe (Ptolomey’s geocentrism). The Church felt that Copernicus’ proposal was in direct contradiction of the teaching of Scripture. Their response towards those who supported this view provide wonderful illustrations of the fallacy of Argumentum Ad Baculum.
Consider the story of Giordano Bruno (1548-1600). He envisioned a multitude of solar systems in limitless space and believed in the astronomical hypothesis of Copernicus. The Church threatened his life unless he changed these views amongst others. Bruno refused to be convinced by the ad baculum and was burned at the stake as a heretic!
It should be noted that an official expression of “profound sorrow” and acknowledgement of error concerning Bruno’s condemnation to death was made during the papacy of John Paul II. I am sure Bruno feels vindicated.
If any of you reading this thread fail to provide other examples of the informal fallcy called Argumentum Ad Baculum, then the administrators of the board will be forced to suspend your membership.
Brian